4.7 Article

Vertical distribution and composition of weed seeds within the plough layer after eleven years of contrasting crop rotation and tillage schemes

Journal

SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH
Volume 161, Issue -, Pages 135-142

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2016.04.005

Keywords

Tillage system; Weed community evolution; Soil weed seed bank

Categories

Funding

  1. Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries
  2. Science without Borders Programme from Brazil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tillage methods and crop rotation are probably the two most important cropping factors affecting weed communities, particularly when herbicide use is restricted. This study examined weed dynamics following eleven years of different tillage and crop rotation treatments. The aboveground grass weed flora was recorded each year and the content and vertical location of individual weed seeds within the plough layer (0-20 cm) were determined after 11 years of continuous mouldboard ploughing (P), pre-sowing tine cultivation to 8-10 cm soil depth (H8-10) and direct drilling (D). The content of weed seeds, especially grass weeds, was determined for three distinct soil layers (0-5, 5-10 and 10-20 cm), reflecting the cultivation depths of the tillage treatments. The annual grass weeds, Apera spica-venti and Vulpia myuros, were promoted by non-inversion tillage and in the case of V. myuros also by frequent cropping of winter cereals. The two non-inversion tillage treatments caused a strong stratification of weed seeds within the plough layer, with the majority of the seeds being accumulated in the upper soil layers, at 0-5 and 510 cm, and markedly less so in the 10-20 cm layer. Ploughing resulted in a more even distribution between the three layers. It is suggested that in cases where severe grass weed problems have built up in a non-inversion tillage system and where changes in crop rotation are ineffective or undesirable, inversion of the upper soil layer with the lower one could be considered a management option. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available