4.6 Article

Micro-mechanics of nanostructured carbon/shape memory polymer hybrid thin film

Journal

SOFT MATTER
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 106-114

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5sm01269d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Royal Academy of Engineering-Research Exchanges with China and India Awards
  2. UoA flexible fund from Northumbria University at Newcastle upon Tyne
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11422217]
  4. EU-COST
  5. RSC
  6. REECE INNOVATION

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the mechanics of hybrid shape memory polymer polystrene (PS) based nanocomposites with skeletal structures of CNFs/MWCNTs formed inside. Experimental results showed an increase of glass transition temperature (T-g) with CNF/MWCNT concentrations instead of a decrease of Tg in nanocomposites filled by spherical particles, and an increase in mechanical properties on both macro-and mm-scales. Compared with CNFs, MWCNTs showed a better mechanical enhancement for PS nanocomposites due to their uniform distribution in the nanocomposites. In nanoindentation tests using the Berkovich tips, indentation size effects and pile-up effects appeared obviously for the nanocomposites, but not for pure PS. Experimental results revealed the enhancement mechanisms of CNFs/MWCNTs related to the secondary structures formed by nanofillers, including two aspects, i.e., filler-polymer interfacial connections and geometrical factors of nanofillers. The filler-polymer interfacial connections were strongly dependent on temperature, thus leading to the opposite changing trend of loss tangent with nanofiller concentrations, respectively, at low and high temperature. The geometrical factors of nanofillers were related to testing scales, further leading to the appearance of pile-up effects for nanocomposites in the nanoindentation tests, in which the size of indents was close to the size of the nanofiller skeleton.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available