4.4 Article

The role of religious advisors in mental health care in the World Mental Health surveys

Journal

SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages 353-367

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00127-016-1290-8

Keywords

Religion; Mental health; Services use

Categories

Funding

  1. United States National Institute of Mental Health [R01MH070884]
  2. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  3. Pfizer Foundation
  4. US Public Health Service [R13-MH066849, R01-MH069864, R01-MH092526, R01-DA016558]
  5. Fogarty International Center [FIRCA R03-TW006481]
  6. Pan American Health Organization
  7. Eli Lilly AMP
  8. Company Foundation
  9. Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc.
  10. GlaxoSmithKline
  11. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  12. Shire Pharmaceuticals
  13. State of Sao Paulo Research Foundation Thematic Project Grant [03/00204-3]
  14. Ministry of Health
  15. National Center for Public Health Protection
  16. Ministry of Social Protection
  17. European Commission [QLG5-1999-01042, SANCO2004123]
  18. Piedmont Region (Italy)
  19. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria
  20. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain [FIS 00/0028]
  21. Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia, Spain [SAF 2000-158-CE]
  22. Departament de Salut
  23. Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain
  24. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [CIBER CB06/02/0046, RETICS RD06/0011 REM-TAP]
  25. Glaxo-SmithKline
  26. United Nations Development Group Iraq Trust Fund (UNDG ITF)
  27. Grant for Research on Psychiatric and Neurological Diseases and Mental Health from the Japan Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare [H13-SHOGAI-023, H14-TOKUBETSU-026, H16-KOKORO-013]
  28. Lebanese Ministry of Public Health
  29. World Health Organization (Lebanon)
  30. National Institute of Health/Fogarty International Center [R03 TW006481-01]
  31. Astra Zeneca
  32. Eli Lilly
  33. Hikma Pharm
  34. Janssen Cilag
  35. MSD
  36. Novartis
  37. Pfizer
  38. Sanofi Aventis
  39. Servier
  40. National Institute of Psychiatry Ramon de la Fuente [INPRFMDIES 4280]
  41. National Council on Science and Technology [CONACyTG-30544-H]
  42. Health and Social Care Research and Development Division of the Public Health Agency
  43. Champalimaud Foundation
  44. Gulbenkian Foundation
  45. Foundation for Science and Technology
  46. Ministry of Public Health
  47. National Institute of Mental Health [U01-MH60220]
  48. National Institute of Drug Abuse
  49. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
  50. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation [044708]
  51. John W. Alden Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To examine the role of religious advisors in mental health care (MHC) according to disorder severity, socio-demographics, religious involvement and country income groups. Face to face household surveys in ten high income (HI), six upper-middle income (UMI) and five low/lower-middle (LLMI) income countries totalling 101,258 adults interviewed with the WMH CIDI plus questions on use of care for mental health problems and religiosity. 1.1% of participants turned to religious providers for MHC in the past year. Among those using services, 12.3% used religious services; as much as 30% in some LLMI countries, around 20% in some UMI; in the HI income countries USA, Germany, Italy and Japan are between 15 and 10% whenever the remaining countries are much lower. In LLMI 20.9% used religious advisors for the most severe mental disorders compared to 12.3 in UMI and 9.5% in HI. For severe cases most of religious providers use occurred together with formal care except in Nigeria, Iraq and Ukraine where, respectively, 41.6, 25.7 and 17.7% of such services are outside any formal care. Frequency of attendance at religious services was a strong predictor of religious provider usage OR 6.5 for those who attended over once a week (p < 0.0001); as seeking comfort often through religion in case of difficulties OR was 3.6 (p = 0.004) while gender and individual income did not predict use of religious advisors nor did the type of religious affiliation; in contrast young people use them more as well as divorced and widowed OR 1.4 (p = 0.02). Some country differences persisted after controlling for all these factors. Religious advisors play an important role in mental health care and require appropriate training and collaboration with formal mental healthcare systems. Religious attitudes are strong predictors of religious advisors usage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available