4.4 Review

Spatio-temporal determinants of mental health and well-being: advances in geographically-explicit ecological momentary assessment (GEMA)

Journal

SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 9, Pages 1211-1223

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00127-016-1277-5

Keywords

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA); Geographic momentary assessment (GMA); Geographically explicit ecological momentary assessment (GEMA); Geographic information systems/science (GIS); Spatio-temporal determinants of health; mHealth

Categories

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health: National Institute on Drug Abuse
  2. US National Institutes of Health: National Cancer Institute
  3. US National Institutes of Health: Office of Behavioral and Social Science Research [R01DA034734, R01DA040930]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Overview of geographically explicit momentary assessment research, applied to the study of mental health and well-being, which allows for cross-validation, extension, and enrichment of research on place and health. Building on the historical foundations of both ecological momentary assessment and geographic momentary assessment research, this review explores their emerging synergy into a more generalized and powerful research framework. Geographically explicit momentary assessment methods are rapidly advancing across a number of complimentary literatures that intersect but have not yet converged. Key contributions from these areas reveal tremendous potential for transdisciplinary and translational science. Mobile communication devices are revolutionizing research on mental health and well-being by physically linking momentary experience sampling to objective measures of socio-ecological context in time and place. Methodological standards are not well-established and will be required for transdisciplinary collaboration and scientific inference moving forward.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available