4.5 Article

Control your anger! The neural basis of aggression regulation in response to negative social feedback

Journal

SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 712-720

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsv154

Keywords

emotion regulation; functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); social acceptance; social evaluation; social rejection

Funding

  1. Gravitation program of the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [024.001.003]
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (VICI)
  4. European Research Council [AdG 669249]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Negative social feedback often generates aggressive feelings and behavior. Prior studies have investigated the neural basis of negative social feedback, but the underlying neural mechanisms of aggression regulation following negative social feedback remain largely undiscovered. In the current study, participants viewed pictures of peers with feedback (positive, neutral or negative) to the participant's personal profile. Next, participants responded to the peer feedback by pressing a button, thereby producing a loud noise toward the peer, as an index of aggression. Behavioral analyses showed that negative feedback led to more aggression (longer noise blasts). Conjunction neuroimaging analyses revealed that both positive and negative feedback were associated with increased activity in the medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) and bilateral insula. In addition, more activation in the right dorsal lateral PFC (dlPFC) during negative feedback vs neutral feedback was associated with shorter noise blasts in response to negative social feedback, suggesting a potential role of dlPFC in aggression regulation, or top-down control over affective impulsive actions. This study demonstrates a role of the dlPFC in the regulation of aggressive social behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available