4.5 Article

The HARMONY Trial Combined Ranolazine and Dronedarone in the Management of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanistic and Therapeutic Synergism

Journal

CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages 1048-1056

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.002856

Keywords

antiarrhythmic drug; atrial fibrillation; clinical trial; dronedarone; drug therapy; ranolazine

Funding

  1. Sanofi
  2. Gilead Sciences, Inc
  3. Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) requires arrhythmogenic changes in atrial ion channels/receptors and usually altered atrial structure. AF is commonly treated with antiarrhythmic drugs; the most effective block many ion channels/receptors. Modest efficacy, intolerance, and safety concerns limit current antiarrhythmic drugs. We hypothesized that combining agents with multiple anti-AF mechanisms at reduced individual drug doses might produce synergistic efficacy plus better tolerance/safety. Methods and Results HARMONY tested midrange ranolazine (750 mg BID) combined with 2 reduced dronedarone doses (150 mg BID and 225 mg BID; chosen to reduce dronedarone's negative inotropic effectsee text below) over 12 weeks in 134 patients with paroxysmal AF and implanted pacemakers where AF burden (AFB) could be continuously assessed. Patients were randomized double-blind to placebo, ranolazine alone (750 mg BID), dronedarone alone (225 mg BID), or one of the combinations. Neither placebo nor either drugs alone significantly reduced AFB. Conversely, ranolazine 750 mg BID/dronedarone 225 mg BID reduced AFB by 59% versus placebo (P=0.008), whereas ranolazine 750 mg BID/dronedarone 150 mg BID reduced AFB by 43% (P=0.072). Both combinations were well tolerated. Conclusions HARMONY showed synergistic AFB reduction by moderate dose ranolazine plus reduced dose dronedarone, with good tolerance/safety, in the population enrolled. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01522651.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available