4.3 Review

Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure: The Role of Precipitating Illness

Journal

SEMINARS IN LIVER DISEASE
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 117-122

Publisher

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1583204

Keywords

acute-on-chronic liver failure; precipitating factors; bacterial infections; cirrhosis; hepatitis B virus

Funding

  1. FIS [PI12/00330]
  2. ISCIII-Subdireccion General de Evaluacion
  3. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  4. Instituto de Salud Carlos III Agencia de Gestio d'Ajuts Universitaris I de Recerca (AGAUR) [SGR 708]
  5. ICREA Academia Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a complex syndrome that develops in patients with cirrhosis at any stage during the natural history of the disease. In most cases, the development of ACLF is associated with an identifiable precipitating factor. Overall, the most common precipitating events are bacterial infections. Although data suggest that any type of infection may trigger ACLF, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, secondary peritonitis, and pneumonia appear to be the most common types of infection leading to ACLF. Nevertheless, frequency and characteristics of precipitating factors differ among geographical areas. Although in the West the most common precipitating factors are bacterial infections followed by active alcoholism, in the East the most common triggering events are exacerbation of hepatitis B virus followed by bacterial infections. Although precipitating events may be crucial in the development of ACLF, mortality appears to be independent of the type of precipitating factor. Finally, it should be noted that in up to 20 to 40% of patients with ACLF no precipitating factor can be identified. It is suggested that in these patients, bacterial products derived from bacterial translocation or damage-associated molecular patterns resulting from injured liver tissue cells may act as triggering factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available