4.3 Article

HLA mismatching as a strategy to reduce relapse after alternative donor transplantation

Journal

SEMINARS IN HEMATOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages 57-64

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2016.01.010

Keywords

HLA mismatch; Alloreactivity; Graft-versus-leukemia; MUD HSCT; Haploidentical HSCT; Umbilical cord blood HSCT

Categories

Funding

  1. European Commission Transcan JTC [Cancer12-045-HLALOSS]
  2. Deutsche Jose Carreras Leukamie Stiftung [DJCLS R 15/02]
  3. Joseph Senker Stiftung, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches are targets of alloreactive T cells, mediators of graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after alternative donor transplantation. Exploitation of HLA mismatching in order to reduce relapse is hampered by necessary interventions aimed at controlling GvHD on the one hand, and by the possibility of immune escape through selective loss of mismatched HLA in relapsing leukemia on the other. Retrospective studies reporting the impact of HLA mismatches on post-transplant relapse need to be interpreted with caution, due to many confounding factors, including disease and use of T-cell depletion, and to be constantly updated to the rapidly changing clinical protocols. Current evidence suggests similar relapse rates for 8/8, 7/8 HLA-matched unrelated, T-cell-replete haploidentical and umbilical cord blood transplantation; however, investigations of locus-specific effects are still scarce in the latter two settings. In unrelated transplantation, a specific role for mismatches at HLA-C and HLA-DPB1, and therein of permissive mismatches defined on the basis of T-cell alloreactivity and/or expression levels, in reducing relapse has been demonstrated in independent studies. This observation suggests new approaches to utilize HLA matching in unrelated donor searches, and the need for further research in the field. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available