4.3 Article

Racial differences in Emergency Department visits for seizures

Journal

SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY
Volume 40, Issue -, Pages 52-56

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.06.007

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Seizures are a common reason for visiting the Emergency Department (ED). There is a growing body of literature highlighting disparities in seizure care related to race and ethnicity. Our goal was to identify racial and clinical characteristics of patients presenting to the ED with seizures and to determine factors associated with repeat ED visits for seizure. Methods: This was a retrospective study evaluating patients presenting with seizure as the primary reason for their ED visit between 01/01/2008 and 12/31/2008. Clinical data were collected from the electronic medical record (EMR) and compared between black and white patients and between patients with single and repeat ED seizure visits. Statistically significant variables were introduced in a logistic regression analysis with repeat ED visits as outcome. Results: Of 38, 879 ED visits, 559 recorded 'seizure' as the primary reason for the visit. Compared to white patients (N = 266), black patients (N = 102) were more likely to have non-private insurance (p = 0.005), less likely to have evidence of regular ambulatory care (p = 0.02) and were more likely to have multiple visits within the calendar year (p = 0.005). Black patient visits were more likely to have missed or ran out of antiepileptic drugs (AED) as the precipitant for their ED visit (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Clinical factors differed between black and white patients presenting to the ED for seizure care. Black patients were more likely to have multiple seizure visits to the ED when compared to white patients. This may suggest a disparity in access to care related to race between these two groups. (C) 2016 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available