4.7 Article

Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Stratification

Journal

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
Volume 116, Issue 12, Pages 1907-1918

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.304493

Keywords

death; sudden; cardiac; risk assessment; tachycardia; ventricular

Funding

  1. Michael Smith Foundation for Medical Research
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  3. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
  4. Sauder Family and Heart and Stroke Foundation Chair in Cardiology
  5. Paul Brunes Chair in Heart Rhythm Disorders
  6. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [1R13HL123252-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arrhythmic sudden cardiac death (SCD) may be caused by ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation or pulseless electric activity/asystole. Effective risk stratification to identify patients at risk of arrhythmic SCD is essential for targeting our healthcare and research resources to tackle this important public health issue. Although our understanding of SCD because of pulseless electric activity/asystole is growing, the overwhelming majority of research in risk stratification has focused on SCD-ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. This review focuses on existing and novel risk stratification tools for SCD-ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. For patients with left ventricular dysfunction or myocardial infarction, advances in imaging, measures of cardiac autonomic function, and measures of repolarization have shown considerable promise in refining risk. Yet the majority of SCD-ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation occurs in patients without known cardiac disease. Biomarkers and novel imaging techniques may provide further risk stratification in the general population beyond traditional risk stratification for coronary artery disease alone. Despite these advances, significant challenges in risk stratification remain that must be overcome before a meaningful impact on SCD can be realized.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available