4.7 Article

C60 fullerenes from combustion of common fuels

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 547, Issue -, Pages 254-260

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.142

Keywords

Nanomaterials; TEM; Emissions

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  2. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under NSF Cooperative Agreement [EF-0830093]
  3. Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology (CEINT)
  4. Environmental Protection Agency via an EPA STAR fellowship [FP91730801]
  5. Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science (ICTAS) at Virginia Tech

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Releases of C-60 fullerenes to the environment will increase with the growth of nanotechnology. Assessing the potential risks of manufactured C-60 requires an understanding of how its prevalence in the environment compares to that of natural and incidental C-60. This work describes the characterization of incidental C-60 present in aerosols generated by combustion of five common fuels: coal, firewood, diesel, gasoline, and propane. C-60 was found in exhaust generated by all five fuels; the highest concentrations in terms of mass of C-60 permass of particulate matter were associated with diesel and coal. Individual aerosols from these combustion processes were examined by transmission electron microscopy. No relationship was found between C-60 content and either the separation of graphitic layers (lamellae) within the particles, nor the curvature of those lamellae. Estimated global emissions of incidental C-60 to the atmosphere from coal and diesel combustion range from 1.6 to 6.3 t yr(-1), depending upon combustion conditions. These emissions may be similar in magnitude to the total amount of manufactured C-60 produced on an annual basis. Consequent loading of incidental C-60 to the environment may be several orders of magnitude higher than has previously been modeled for manufactured C-60. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available