4.7 Article

Greenhouse gases emission from soils under major crops in Northwest India

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 542, Issue -, Pages 551-561

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.073

Keywords

Carbon dioxide; Nitrous oxide; Methane; Cereals; Millets; Oilseeds; Pulses

Funding

  1. Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC), Govt. of India [IND0264.05-16/2007-08/WH-647]
  2. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantification of greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions from agriculture is necessary to prepare the national inventories and to develop the mitigation strategies. Field experiments were conducted during 2008-2010 at the experimental farm of the Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India to quantify nitrous oxide (N2O), methane (CH4), and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from soils under cereals, pulses, millets, and oilseed crops. Total cumulative N2O emissions were significantly different (P > 0.05) among the crop types. Emission of N2O as percentage of applied N was the highest in pulses (0.67%) followed by oilseeds (0.55%), millets (0.43%) and cereals (0.40%). The emission increased with increasing rate of N application (r(2) = 0.74, P < 0.05). The cumulative flux of CH4 from the rice crop was 28.64 +/- 4.40 kg ha(-1), while the mean seasonal integrated flux of CO2 from soils ranged from 3058 +/- 236 to 3616 +/- 157 kg CO2 ha(-1) under different crops. The global warming potential (GWP) of crops varied between 3053 kg CO2 eq. ha(-1) (pigeon pea) and 3968 kg CO2 eq. ha(-1) (wheat). The carbon equivalent emission (CEE) was least in pigeon pea (833 kg C ha(-1)) and largest in wheat (1042 kg C ha(-1)). The GWP per unit of economic yield was the highest in pulses and the lowest in cereal crops. The uncertainties in emission values varied from 4.6 to 22.0%. These emission values will be useful in updating the GHGs emission inventory of Indian agriculture. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available