4.7 Article

Contrasting distributions of groundwater arsenic and uranium in the western Hetao basin, Inner Mongolia: Implication for origins and fate controls

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 541, Issue -, Pages 1172-1190

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.018

Keywords

Redox-sensitive element; Reductive dissolution; Oxidative dissolution; As species; U species; Coprecipitation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41222020, 41172224]
  2. China Geology Survey [12120113103700]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2652013028]
  4. Fok Ying-Tung Education Foundation, China [131017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although As concentrations have been investigated in shallow groundwater from the Hetao basin, China, less is known about U and As distributions in deep groundwater, which would help to better understand their origins and fate controls. Two hundred and ninety-nine groundwater samples, 122 sediment samples, and 14 rock samples were taken from the northwest portion of the Hetao basin, and analyzed for geochemical parameters. Results showed contrasting distributions of groundwater U and As, with high U and low As concentrations in the alluvial fans along the basin margins, and low U and high As concentrations downgradient in the flat plain. The probable sources of both As and U in groundwater were ultimately traced to the bedrocks in the local mountains (the Langshan Mountains). Chemical weathering of U-bearing rocks (schist, phyllite, and carbonate veins) released and mobilized U as UO2(CO3)(2)(2-) and UO2(CO3)(3)(4-) species in the alluvial fans under oxic conditions and suboxic conditions where reductions of Mn and NO3- were favorable (OSO), resulting in high groundwater U concentrations. Conversely, the recentweathering of As-bearing rocks (schist, phyllite, and sulfides) led to the formation of As-bearing Fe(III) (hydr) oxides in sediments, resulting in low groundwater As concentrations. Arsenicmobilization and U immobilization occurred in suboxic conditions where reduction of Fe(III) oxides was favorable and reducing conditions (SOR). Reduction of As-bearing Fe(III) (hydr) oxides, which were formed during palaeo-weathering and transported and deposited as Quaternary aquifer sediments, was believed to release As into groundwater. Reduction of U(VI) to U(IV) would lead to the formation of uraninite, and therefore remove U from groundwater. We conclude that the contrasting distributions of groundwater As and U present a challenge to ensuring safe drinking water in analogous areas, especially with high background values of U and As. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available