4.7 Article

Regional contribution to PM1 pollution during winter haze in Yangtze River Delta, China

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 541, Issue -, Pages 161-166

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.058

Keywords

Haze; Submicron particulate matter; Components; Regional source; Yangtze River Delta

Funding

  1. Natural Science Key Research of Jiangsu Province High Education [11KJA170002]
  2. Foundation Research Project of Jiangsu Province [BK2012884, BK20140987]
  3. Jiangsu Province Science & Technology Support Program [BE2012771]
  4. Environmental Monitoring Scientific Research Foundation of Jiangsu Province [1016]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21407080]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To quantify regional sources contributing to submicron particulate matter (PM1) pollution in haze episodes, online measurements combining two modeling methods, namely, positive matrix factorization (PMF) and backward Lagrangian particle dispersion modeling (LPDM), were conducted for the period of one month in urban Nanjing, a city located in the western part of Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region of China. Several multi-day haze episodes were observed in December 2013. Long-range transport of biomass burning from the southwestern YRD region largely contributed to PM1 pollution with more than 25% of total organicsmass in a lasting heavy haze. The LPDM analysis indicates that regional transport is a main source contributing to secondary low-volatility production. The high-potential source regions of secondary low-volatility production are mainly located in areas to the northeast of the city. High aerosol pollution was mainly contributed by regional transport associated with northeastern air masses. Such regional transport on average accounts for 46% of total NR-PM1 with sulfate and aged low-volatility organics being the largest fractions (>65%). (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available