4.7 Article

High bioconcentration of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in Daphnia magna determined by kinetic approach

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 569, Issue -, Pages 1224-1231

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.197

Keywords

TiO2 NPs; Bioaccumulation; Kinetics; Daphnia magna; Bioconcentration

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21577116, 51378041, 51290283]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral 474 Program of Higher Education [20131102110035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The environmental risk assessments of titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs) have drawn wide attention and one of the required critical information is the bioconcentration potentials of these nanoparticles in aquatic organisms. In the present study, the bioconcentration of six commercially available TiO2 NPs with different sizes and surface properties were quantified in a freshwater cladoceran Daphnia magna using kinetic modeling approach. We first calculated the uptake rate constant (k) and depuration rate constant (k(e)) of TiO2 NPs and then employed a first-order kinetic model to predict the bioconcentration factors (BCE) at different TiO2 NPs concentrations. Both the k(u) and k(e) of TiO2 NPs were significantly affected by the exposure concentration and the nano particle property. The predicted BCE values in D. magna of six TiO2 NPs ranged from 2.40 x 105 L/kg to 1.52 x l0 L/kg, and had no clear correlation with the exposure concentration. Large nominal size resulted in a lower BCE of TiO2 NPs at lower exposure concentration. Higher hydrophobicity and Al(OH)3 coating also resulted in a higher BCE. All the six TiO2 NPs in this study were therefore considered very bioaccumulative. More attention should be paid to bioconcentration in the environmental risk assessments of TiO2 NPs, and the physicochemical properties of TiO2 NPs should be taken into account. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All lights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available