4.7 Article

RAPPER: A new method for rapid assessment of macroalgae as a complement to diatom-based assessments of ecological status

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 568, Issue -, Pages 536-545

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.068

Keywords

Algae; Eutrophication; Rivers; Triage; Ecological assessment; Citizen science

Funding

  1. Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most methods for ecological assessment developed since the onset of the Water Framework Directive require substantial effort by skilled analysts and are therefore expensive to use. RAPPER (Rapid Assessment of PeriPhyton Ecology in Rivers) is a high level ecological triage method that enables rapid screening of sites within a water body to enable managers to identify areas subject to nutrient pressures. The method involves a survey of macroscopic algae within 10 m lengths of watercourses, taking samples for subsequent identification, and assessing cover. Genus-level identification is used to ensure rapid assessment and comparability, and that the method can be used by a wide range of users. Genera of alga that form conspicuous growths recognisable with the naked eye are designated as either stress-tolerant (S-taxa) or competitive taxa (C-taxa), depending on their preference for locations with low or high nutrient concentrations. Genera whose representatives span a wide range of nutrient conditions, or for which few data are available, are placed in a third class, unclassified. The presence of S-taxa and the relative cover of C-taxa are then used to determine whether a site is at risk from eutrophication. Field trials in Scotland demonstrated that the method discriminates between sites with low and high nutrient concentrations. Significant differences were also observed in values of the Trophic Diatom Index between RAPPER classification categories. RAPPER can be used alone (allowing greater spatial or temporal coverage within water bodies at lower cost than conventional assessment methods) or to increase confidence in assessments of the condition of the phytobenthos by incorporating algae other than diatoms. The outcomes also relate directly to the experiences of non-technical stakeholders, and will have benefits for communicating ecosystem health concepts to the wider public, for example through citizen science. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available