4.7 Article

A study of ambient fine particles at Tianjin International Airport, China

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 556, Issue -, Pages 126-135

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.186

Keywords

Airport; Fine particles; Aircraft emissions; Number size distribution; PM2.5; On-site measurements

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (The 973 Program) [2012CB720100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The total count number concentration of particles from 10 to 1000 nm, particle size distribution, and PM2.5 (aerodynamic diameter <= 2.5 mu m) mass concentration were measured on a parking apron next to the runway at Tianjin International Airport in China. The data were collected 250, 270, 300, 350, and 400 m from the runway. Wind direction and wind speed played important roles in determining the characteristics of the atmospheric particles. An inverted U-shaped relationship was observed between the measured particle number concentration and wind speed, with an average peak concentration of 2.2 x 10(5) particles/cm3 at wind speeds of approximately 4-5 m/s. The atmospheric particle number concentration was affected mainly by aircraft takeoffs and landings, and the PM2.5 mass concentration was affected mainly by the relative humidity (RH) of the atmosphere. Ultrafine particles (UFPs, diameter < 100 nm), with the highest number concentration at a particle size of approximately 16 nm, dominated the measured particle size distributions. The calculated particle emission index values for aircraft takeoff and landing were nearly the same, with mean values of 7.5 x 10(15) particles/(kg fuel) and 7.6 x 10(15) particles/(kg fuel), respectively. The particle emission rate for one aircraft during takeoff is two orders of magnitude higher than for all gasoline-powered passenger vehicles in Tianjin combined. The particle number concentrations remained much higher than the background concentrations even beyond 400 m from the runway. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available