4.7 Article

Contamination of wild plants near neonicotinoid seed-treated crops, and implications for non-target insects

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 566, Issue -, Pages 269-278

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.065

Keywords

Neonicotinoid insecticides; Field margins; Non-target invertebrates; Environmental contamination

Funding

  1. Soil Association (Bristol, UK)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neonicotinoid insecticides are commonly-used as seed treatments on flowering crops such as oilseed rape. Their persistence and solubility in water increase the chances of environmental contamination via surface-runoff or drainage into areas adjacent to the crops. However, their uptake and fate into non-target vegetation remains poorly understood. In this study, we analysed samples of foliage collected from neonicotinoid seed-treated oilseed rape plants and also compared the levels of neonicotinoid residues in foliage (range: 1.4-11 ng/g) with the levels found in pollen collected from the same plants (range: 1.4-22 ng/g). We then analysed residue levels in foliage from non-target plants growing in the crop field margins (range: <= 0.02-106 ng/g). Finally, in order to assess the possible risk posed by the peak levels of neonicotinoids that we detected in foliage for farmland phytophagous and predatory insects, we compared the maximum concentrations found against the LC50 values reported in the literature for a set of relevant insect species. Our results suggest that neonicotinoid seed-dressings lead to widespread contamination of the foliage of field margin plants with mixtures of neonicotinoid residues, where levels are very variable and discontinuous, but sometimes overlap with lethal concentrations reported for some insect species. Understanding the distribution of pesticides in the environment and their potential effects on biological communities is crucial to properly assess current agricultural management and schemes with biodiversity conservation aims in farmland. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available