4.7 Article

Modelling regional variability of irrigation requirements due to climate change in Northern Germany

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 541, Issue -, Pages 329-340

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.043

Keywords

Irrigation; Climate change; Field water capacity; Soil moisture; Water availability; North German Plain

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research [033L029H]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The question whether global climate change invalidates the efficiency of established land use practice cannot be answered without systemic considerations on a region specific basis. In this context plant water availability and irrigation requirements, respectively, were investigated in Northern Germany. The regions under investigation - Diepholz, Uelzen, Fleming and Oder-Spree - represent a climatic gradient with increasing continentality from West to East. Besides regional climatic variation and climate change, soil conditions and crop management differ on the regional scale. In the model regions, temporal seasonal droughts influence crop success already today, but on different levels of intensity depending mainly on climate conditions. By linking soil water holding capacities, crop management data and calculations of evapotranspiration and precipitation from the climate change scenario RCP 8.5 irrigation requirements for maintaining crop productivity were estimated for the years 1991 to 2070. Results suggest that water requirement for crop irrigation is likely to increase with considerable regional variation. For some of the regions, irrigation requirements might increase to such an extent that the established regional agricultural practice might be hard to retain. Where water availability is limited, agricultural practice, like management and cultivated crop spectrum, has to be changed to deal with the new challenges. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available