4.6 Review

Early millet use in West Liaohe area during early-middle Holocene

Journal

SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 59, Issue 8, Pages 1554-1561

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11430-015-5257-5

Keywords

Plant domestication; West Liaohe region; Agricultural origin; Neolithic Age; Starch grain analysis

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA05130603, XDA05130402]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41371217, 41072140, 41301208]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is generally recognized that millet agriculture originated in northern China. However, the domestication process of foxtail millet ( Setaria italica) and broomcorn millet ( Panicum miliaceum) is still poorly understood. Based on statistical and morphological analyses of ancient millet starch grains, a tangible hypothesis has been proposed for the long-term domestication of green foxtail millet ( S. viridis). However, the hypothesis requires validation by evidence from more regions and more archaeological finds. The West Liaohe region is one of the earliest regions of millet cultivation. Here, we report ancient starch grains recovered from 12 stone grinding tools from eight sites of the Xiaohexi culture ( before 8.5 ka BP), Xinglongwa culture ( 8.2-7.4 ka BP), Zhaobaogou culture ( 7.0-6.4 ka BP), and Hongshan culture ( 6.5-5.0 ka BP) in the West Liaohe region of China. Our results indicate that the proportion of millet starch grains with wrinkled surfaces and rough edges, which are diagnostic of wild millet grasses, decreased from 13.0% to 3.4% from the Xiaohexi culture to the Hongshan culture. Millet starch grains measuring > 16.8. m, a size class recorded only in domesticated foxtail millet, increased from 55.0% to 62.1%. These millet data imply that the process of millet domestication in the West Liaohe region began in the Xiaohexi period and continued up to the Hongshan period.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available