4.8 Article

Histone H3K36 mutations promote sarcomagenesis through altered histone methylation landscape

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 352, Issue 6287, Pages 844-849

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aac7272

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Rockefeller University
  2. Wisconsin Institute for Discovery
  3. Greater Milwaukee Foundation
  4. Starr Cancer Consortium [SCC I6-A614]
  5. Sidney Kimmel Foundation
  6. NIH [P01CA196539, DP2OD007447, R01GM110174, DP2CA174499, K08CA151660, K08CA181475]
  7. NIH (Cancer Center Support grant) [P30CA008748]
  8. Genome Canada
  9. Genome Quebec
  10. Institute for Cancer Research of the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR)
  11. McGill University
  12. Montreal Children's Hospital Foundation
  13. Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation [DRG-2195-14]
  14. Chercheur Clinician Senior Award
  15. Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds Predoctoral fellowship
  16. T.D Trust/Montreal Children's Hospital Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several types of pediatric cancers reportedly contain high-frequency missense mutations in histone H3, yet the underlying oncogenic mechanism remains poorly characterized. Here we report that the H3 lysine 36-to-methionine (H3K36M) mutation impairs the differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells and generates undifferentiated sarcoma in vivo. H3K36M mutant nucleosomes inhibit the enzymatic activities of several H3K36 methyltransferases. Depleting H3K36 methyltransferases, or expressing an H3K36I mutant that similarly inhibits H3K36 methylation, is sufficient to phenocopy the H3K36M mutation. After the loss of H3K36 methylation, a genome-wide gain in H3K27 methylation leads to a redistribution of polycomb repressive complex 1 and de-repression of its target genes known to block mesenchymal differentiation. Our findings are mirrored in human undifferentiated sarcomas in which novel K36M/I mutations in H3.1 are identified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available