4.8 Article

Surgery for Aortic Dilatation in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valves A Statement of Clarification From the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 133, Issue 7, Pages 680-686

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000331

Keywords

thoracic aortic disease; heart valves; thoracic aortic aneurysm; AHA Scientific Statements; valvular heart disease; thoracic aortic dissection; anticoagulation therapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two guidelines from the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and collaborating societies address the risk of aortic dissection in patients with bicuspid aortic valves and severe aortic enlargement: the 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Thoracic Aortic Disease (Circulation. 2010;121:e266-e369) and the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease (Circulation. 2014;129:e521-e643). However, the 2 guidelines differ with regard to the recommended threshold of aortic root or ascending aortic dilatation that would justify surgical intervention in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. The ACC and AHA therefore convened a subcommittee representing members of the 2 guideline writing committees to review the evidence, reach consensus, and draft a statement of clarification for both guidelines. This statement of clarification uses the ACC/AHA revised structure for delineating the Class of Recommendation and Level of Evidence to provide recommendations that replace those contained in Section 9.2.2.1 of the thoracic aortic disease guideline and Section 5.1.3 of the valvular heart disease guideline.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available