4.3 Article

Maternal use of folic acid supplements and infant risk of neural tube defects in Norway 1999-2013

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 619-626

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1403494816649494

Keywords

Neural tube defects; folic acid; folate; multivitamins; Norway; reproduction; health promotion; epidemiology

Funding

  1. Western Norway Regional Health Authority (Helse Vest) [911647, 911629]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: Like most European countries, Norway has refrained from mandatory food fortification with folic acid to reduce the number of neural tube defects. We explored the role of folic acid and multivitamin supplements in the prevention of neural tube defects among newborn infants. Methods: We used data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, 1999-2013. A total of 528,220 women had 880,568 pregnancies resulting in 896,674 live- and stillborn infants, of whom 270 had neural tube defects. Relative risks were estimated with log-binomial regression. Results: From 1999 to 2013, intake of folic acid supplements increased from 4.8% to 27.4%. Vitamin supplement use was more frequent in older, married or cohabiting women and those with lower parity, as well as women who did not smoke during pregnancy. The overall adjusted relative risk of infant neural tube defects associated with maternal vitamin intake before pregnancy relative to no intake was 0.76 (95% confidence interval: 0.53-1.10). When we divided our study period in two (1999-2005 and 2006-2013), we found a significantly reduced risk of neural tube defects overall by vitamin use in the second time period, but not in the first: adjusted relative risk 0.54 (95% confidence interval: 0.31-0.91) and 1.02 (95% confidence interval: 0.63-1.65), respectively. Conclusions:Over the full study period, we found no statistically significant association between vitamin use and neural tube defects overall. However, vitamin use was associated with a significantly lower risk of neural tube defects in the second half of the study period, 2006-2013.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available