4.5 Article

Effect of resistance training on phase angle in older women: A randomized controlled trial

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages 1308-1316

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sms.12745

Keywords

Aging; strength training; skeletal muscle; cellular hydration; spectral bioimpedance

Categories

Funding

  1. National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq/Brazil)
  2. Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES/Brazil)
  3. Araucaria Foundation for the Support of Scientific and Technological Development of Parana (FAADCT/Brazil)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phase angle (PhA) is an angular-derived bioelectrical impedance parameter based on resistance and reactance that has been widely used in different populations as an objective indicator of cellular health. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of resistance training (RT) on PhA in older women. Forty-one older women (67.2 +/- 4.5 years, 64.0 +/- 12.3 kg, 154.7 +/- 5.2 cm, and 26.6 +/- 4.8 kg/m(2)) were randomly assigned to one of two groups: a training group (TG, n = 19) that underwent progressive RT for 12 weeks (eight exercises, three sets of 10-15 repetitions maximum, three times per week) or a control group (CG, n = 22) that did not perform any type of exercise during the intervention period. Resistance, reactance, PhA, total body water (TBW), intracellular (ICW) and extracellular (ECW) water were assessed by spectral bioelectrical impedance. There was a significant group by time interaction (P < 0.05) for PhA, TBW, and ICW in which only the TG increased their scores after the intervention period (PhA = +6.5%, TBW = +2.8%, and ICW = +5.1%). The results suggest that progressive RT promotes an increase in PhA in older women. Therefore, the PhA seems to be a good parameter to assess changes in cellular health during RT intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available