4.2 Article

Activation of Complement Following Total Hip Replacement

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages 219-224

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sji.12411

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Icelandic College of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Iceland
  2. University of Iceland
  3. Student Innovation Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to investigate whether complement activation, via the classical and alternative pathways, occurs following a cemented total hip replacement (THR) surgery due to osteoarthritis. Blood samples were collected systematically from 12 patients - six male and six women, with a median age of 75 (range: 59-90years) - preoperatively, 6h post-operatively and on the first, second and third post-operative day. Total function of classical (CH50) and alternative pathways (AH50) was evaluated, along with the determination of serum concentrations of the complement proteins C3, C4, C3d, the soluble terminal complement complex (sTCC) sC5b-9, as well as C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin. Measurements of CRP and albumin levels elucidated a marked inflammatory response following the operation. The CH50, AH50 and C3 and C4 levels were significantly lower 6h after the surgery compared with the preoperative levels, but elevated above the preoperative levels during the following 3days. The complement activation product C3d levels increased continually during the whole observation period, from 13.5AU/ml (range: 8-19AU/ml) preoperative to 20AU/ml (range: 12-34AU/ml) on the third post-operative day. Furthermore, we observed an increase in the sC5b-9 levels between the preoperative and the third post-operative day. These results demonstrate a significant activation of the complement system following cemented THR. Further studies are needed to elucidate the time frame and the pathogenic role of this observed complement activation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available