4.7 Article

Safety implementation framework for Pakistani construction industry

Journal

SAFETY SCIENCE
Volume 82, Issue -, Pages 301-314

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.09.019

Keywords

Pakistani construction; Safety framework; Regulatory enhancements; Safety culture; Delphi

Funding

  1. US Agency for International Development (USAID) under the joint Pakistan-U.S. Science and Technology Cooperation Program (Phase 4) Grant [P210885]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the Pakistani construction industry's recent rapid growth and development, workers are still working in poor safety conditions. While Pakistan has several occupational safety and health laws, they are too broad to be applied directly to the construction industry. Due to the presence of a weak regulatory system, worker safety is not a principal focus of the construction industry. This paper presents a case study that was conducted to help improve the existing construction safety situation in Pakistan by developing a framework for better implementation of safety practices and thus bridging the safety related perceptual gaps between the different stakeholders and regulatory authorities. The proposed safety framework is composed of guidelines for a reciprocal safety implementation system with aspects such as regulatory enhancements and corporate safety culture improvements. The framework was analyzed using the Delphi method and priorities were defined as rated/ranked by a panel of Pakistani construction safety experts. The emphasis of this framework is to expend all possible efforts to minimize the safety risks for construction workers through stronger regulations and voluntary compliance efforts by all the stakeholders. This case study can serve as a model for other developing countries to further develop and improve their construction safety environment. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available