4.7 Article

Rock Burst Monitoring by Integrated Microseismic and Electromagnetic Radiation Methods

Journal

ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING
Volume 49, Issue 11, Pages 4393-4406

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-016-1037-6

Keywords

Rock burst; Coal mine; Microseismic; Electromagnetic radiation; Integrated monitoring

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51574231]
  2. Excellent Innovation Team of China University of Mining and Technology [2014ZY001]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2015XKMS005]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For this study, microseismic (MS) and electromagnetic radiation (EMR) monitoring systems were installed in a coal mine to monitor rock bursts. The MS system monitors coal or rock mass ruptures in the whole mine, whereas the EMR equipment monitors the coal or rock stress in a small area. By analysing the MS energy, number of MS events, and EMR intensity with respect to rock bursts, it has been shown that the energy and number of MS events present a quiet period 1-3 days before the rock burst. The data also show that the EMR intensity reaches a peak before the rock burst and this EMR intensity peak generally corresponds to the MS quiet period. There is a positive correlation between stress and EMR intensity. Buckling failure of coal or rock depends on the rheological properties and occurs after the peak stress in the high-stress concentration areas in deep mines. The MS quiet period before the rock burst is caused by the heterogeneity of the coal and rock structures, the transfer of high stress into internal areas, locked patches, and self-organized criticality near the stress peak. This study increases our understanding of coal and rock instability in deep mines. Combining MS and EMR to monitor rock burst could improve prediction accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available