4.7 Article

The Effects of Crack Openings on Crack Initiation, Propagation and Coalescence Behavior in Rock-Like Materials Under Uniaxial Compression

Journal

ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING
Volume 49, Issue 9, Pages 3481-3494

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-016-0998-9

Keywords

Rock-like materials; Pre-existing open flaws; Crack opening; Crack coalescence; Mechanical behavior

Funding

  1. project 973 [2014CB046903]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51325903, 51279218]
  3. Natural Science Foundation Project of CQ CSTC [CSTC, cstc2013kjrcljrccj0001, cstc2013jcyjys30002]
  4. research fund of the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20130191110037]
  5. Chongqing Graduate Student Research Innovation Project [CYB14017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper experimentally investigates the cracking behavior of rock-like specimens containing artificial open flaws under uniaxial compressive loads. The present experiments mainly focus on the effects of crack openings on crack propagation and coalescence behavior in rock-like materials under uniaxial compression. The real-time crack coalescence processes in the specimens with different crack openings are analyzed. The experimental results show that the crack openings significantly affect the crack initiation stresses and the crack initiation modes. The initiation stresses of wing cracks and coplanar secondary cracks decrease with increasing crack openings. However, the initiation stress of anti-wing cracks increases with increasing crack openings. Moreover, five types of crack coalescence in the specimens containing three pre-existing open flaws under uniaxial compression are observed. The effects of crack openings on the mechanical properties of rock-like materials, which include the complete axial stress-strain curves, peak stresses, peak strains and initiation stresses, are investigated in detail.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available