4.7 Article

Autoantibodies against a complement component 1 q subcomponent contribute to complement activation and recurrent thrombosis/pregnancy morbidity in anti-phospholipid syndrome

Journal

RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 8, Pages 1403-1411

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew196

Keywords

anti-phospholipid syndrome; complement activation; anti-C1q antibodies

Categories

Funding

  1. JSPS [26293230, 25670455, 25461466]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25461466, 26293230, 25670455, 15K09514, 16K09885] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To investigate the prevalence and significance of the autoantibodies against complement component 1 q subcomponent (C1q) in patients with APS. Methods. In all, 40 consecutive primary APS patients, 42 patients with non-SLE CTDs and 20 SLE patients negative for aPL were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. Refractory APS was defined as a clinical status of recurring thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity during adequate secondary prophylaxis. An ELISA was used to measure serum levels of anti-C1q antibodies and anaphylatoxins (C3a, C4a). Results. Anti-C1q antibodies were found in 36% (15/42) and 2.5% (1/40) of primary APS patients and controls, respectively. Among primary APS patients, anti-C1q antibody titres were significantly correlated with serum C4a levels (P = 0.013). Neither the prevalence nor the titre of anti-C1q antibodies was associated with any specific clinical manifestations of APS, nor titres of aPL. Refractory APS patients (n = 10) had a higher prevalence of anti-C1q antibodies (9/10 vs 6/32, P = 0.01) than APS patients without recurrence (n = 32). Conclusion. Anti-C1q antibodies are associated with complement activation in APS and may contribute to the pathogenesis, particularly in refractory cases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available