4.4 Article

RANIBIZUMAB FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA REFRACTORY TO MULTIPLE PRIOR TREATMENTS

Journal

RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES
Volume 36, Issue 7, Pages 1292-1297

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000876

Keywords

diabetic macular edema; diabetic retinopathy; Lucentis; macular edema; ranibizumab

Categories

Funding

  1. Acucela
  2. Alcon
  3. Ampio
  4. Lpath
  5. Ohr
  6. Ophthotec
  7. Pfizer
  8. Thrombogenics
  9. Xoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Diabetic macular edema can be refractory to multiple treatment modalities. Although there have been anecdotal reports of ranibizumab showing efficacy when other modalities provided limited benefit, little has been published on treatment for refractory diabetic macular edema. This study sought to investigate this observation further. Methods: Retrospective chart review. Results: Thirty-three eyes of 22 patients with refractory diabetic macular edema were treated with 0.3 mg intravitreal ranibizumab. This group of eyes received an average of 5.1 prior treatments (macular laser, intravitreal bevacizumab, triamcinolone acetonide, or dexamethasone implant). The mean best corrected visual acuity before the initial ranibizumab injection was 20/110 and the mean central subfield thickness was 384 mm. After 7 visits over an average of 48 weeks, during which an average of 6 ranibizumab injections were administered, the mean visual acuity improved to 20/90 and the mean central subfield thickness improved to 335 mm. Both central subfield thickness and best corrected visual acuity improved with number of days of follow-up in a statistically significant fashion (P < 0.01). Similarly, both central subfield thickness and visual acuity improved with number of ranibizumab injections in a linear fashion, but this was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Ranibizumab can improve diabetic macular edema refractory to prior treatments of laser photocoagulation, intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide, and bevacizumab.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available