4.6 Article

Isolation, characterization and evaluation of probiotic lactic acid bacteria for potential use in animal production

Journal

RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE
Volume 108, Issue -, Pages 125-132

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2016.08.009

Keywords

Lactic acid bacteria; Probiotics; Broilers; Lactobacillus pentosus

Funding

  1. Cuban Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment (CITMA, National Program for Biotechnology of Agriculture and Livestock)
  2. Cuban Ministry of Higher Education (MES)
  3. Spanish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation (AECID)
  4. Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (CAPES) [664/2008]
  5. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [AGL2011-24889]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In livestock production, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are the most common microorganisms used as probiotics. For such use, these bacteria must be correctly identified and characterized to ensure their safety and efficiency. In the present study, LAB were isolated from broiler excreta, where a fermentation process was used. Nine among sixteen isolates were identified by biochemical and molecular (sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene) methods as Lactobacillus crispatus (n = 1), Lactobacillus pentosus (n = 1), Weissella cibaria (n = 1), Pediococcus pentosaceus (n = 2) and Enterococcus hirae (n = 4). Subsequently, these bacteria were characterized for their growth capabilities, lactic acid production, acidic pH and bile salts tolerance, cell surface hydrophobicity, antimicrobial susceptibility and antagonistic activity. Lactobacillus pentosus strain LB-31, which showed the best characteristics, was selected for further analysis. This strain was administered to broilers and showed the ability of modulating the immune response and producing beneficial effects on morpho-physiological, productive and health indicators of the animals. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available