4.7 Article

Influences of installation and tracking errors on the optical performance of a solar parabolic trough collector

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 94, Issue -, Pages 197-212

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.036

Keywords

Parabolic trough collector; Coordinate transformation; Installation error; Tracking error; Flux distribution

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51406194]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [3154042]
  3. National High-tech R&D Program (863 Program) of China [2012AA050603]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The parabolic trough collector is an important component of parabolic trough solar thermal power generation systems. Coordinate transformations and the Monte Carlo Ray Trace (MCRT) method were combined to simulate the circumferential flux distribution on absorber tubes. The simulation model includes the optics cone with non-parallel rays, geometric concentration ratios (GCs), the glass tube transmissivity, the absorber tube absorptance and the collector surface reflectivity. The mode is used to analyze the effects of absorber tube installation errors and reflector tracking errors. The results are compared with reference data to verify the model accuracy. Influences of installation and tracking errors on the flux distribution are analyzed for different errors, incident angles and GCs. For a GC of 20 and 90 rim angle, X direction installation errors are -0.2%--0.2%, Y direction installation errors are 1.0%-0.5%, and the tracking error should be less than 4 mrad. As the incident angle increases, the errors become larger, but the errors become smaller as concentration ratios are increased. The results provide foundations for heat transfer analysis of the absorber tube, for parabolic trough plant to ensure the safe intensity, and for economic analysis of the installation process and control system. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available