4.7 Article

Combining solar irradiance measurements, satellite-derived data and a numerical weather prediction model to improve intra-day solar forecasting

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 97, Issue -, Pages 599-610

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.06.018

Keywords

Solar forecasting; Numerical weather prediction; Artificial neural networks; Satellite images

Funding

  1. Spanish Government [CTM2014-55014-C3-1-R]
  2. Catedra Endesa Red de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria en su Convocatoria del curso

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Isolated power systems need to generate all the electricity demand with their own renewable resources. Among the latter, solar energy may account for a large share. However, solar energy is a fluctuating source and the island power grid could present an unstable behavior with a high solar penetration. Global Horizontal Solar Irradiance (GHI) forecasting is an important issue to increase solar energy production into electric power system. This study is focused in hourly GHI forecasting from 1 to 6 h ahead. Several statistical models have been successfully tested in GHI forecasting, such us autoregressive (AR), autoregressive moving average (ARMA) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). In this paper, ANN models are designed to produce intra-day solar forecasts using ground and exogenous data. Ground data were obtained from two measurement stations in Gran Canaria Island. In order to improve the results obtained with ground data, satellite GHI data (from Helioclim-3) as well as solar radiation and Total Cloud Cover forecasts provided by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) are used as additional inputs of the ANN model. It is shown that combining exogenous data (satellite and ECMWF forecasts) with ground data further improves the accuracy of the intra-day forecasts. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available