4.7 Article

Influence of wave resource assessment methodology on wave energy production estimates

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 86, Issue -, Pages 1145-1160

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.09.020

Keywords

Wave energy resource assessment; Wave energy converters; SWAN model; Spectral wave partitioning

Funding

  1. Natural Resources Canada
  2. Pacific Institute of Climate Solutions
  3. Natural Sciences and Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Renewable energy resource inventories show that ocean waves are one of the most energy dense untapped resources in the world, and present an opportunity to generate significant quantities of electricity. To accurately assess the levels of usable energy over long periods, a parametric representation of the raw wave resource is required. This study investigates the variability across four wave energy assessment methods, and two input data sources, to quantify the uncertainties in WEC power production assessments. Two conventional methods were tested: a time-series method and a standard spectral method with a generic spectral shape. Two higher fidelity techniques were additionally studied; an aggregate spectral and a partitioned spectral method. Annual WEC energy production assessments varied between 472 MWh and 543 MWh, a difference of 15%. The partitioned spectral method is shown to minimize prediction uncertainties, yet results in a 14% reduction in annual WEC energy production and increasing power variability. Spectral shape has limited impact on power estimates and energy production assessments, while the numerical wave model data can underestimate annual energy estimates by up to 13%. These uncertainties significantly impact the feasibility of wave energy developments and need to be accounted for as the industry matures. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available