4.8 Review

Microbial electrolysis cells: An emerging technology for wastewater treatment and energy recovery. From laboratory to pilot plant and beyond

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 55, Issue -, Pages 942-956

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.029

Keywords

Microbial electrochemical technologies; Microbial electrolysis cell; Wastewater; Hydrogen; Scale up

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry Economy and Competitiveness [ENE 2012-33027 IFT-2012-0078-310000]
  2. Regional Government of Castilla y Leon

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) are cutting edge technology with great potential to become an alternative to conventional wastewater treatments (anaerobic digestion, activated sludge, etc.). One of the main features of MECs is that they allow organic matter present in wastewater to be converted into hydrogen thus helping to offset the energy consumed during treatment. There are already some large-scale experiments under way but MECs are far from being a mature technology; important challenges, mostly techno-economic in nature (cost of materials, hydrogen management, etc.) remain. This study provides an up-to-date review of the latest developments in MECs, paying special attention to those aspects that may be critical to the commercial viability of MECs for wastewater treatment and hydrogen production. It explores the suitability of different cell configurations and the scalability of MEC designs; it also reviews many of the laboratory, semi-pilot and pilot scale experiments. The review provides a critical analysis of the current state and the future prospects for MECs; it highlights factors crucial to the development of successful MEC designs, identifies potential application niches and discusses the integration of MECs with energy transportation systems. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available