4.8 Review

Dynamic operation of daylighting and shading systems: A literature review

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 60, Issue -, Pages 268-283

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.246

Keywords

Shading and daylighting systems; Automation; Dynamic systems; Controls; Energy efficiency; Occupants' comfort; Software tools

Funding

  1. European Union (European Social Fund-ESF)
  2. Greek National Funds through the Operational Program Education and Lifelong Learning of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF)-Research Funding Program: Heracleitus II

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The primary goal of dynamic building envelopes is to meet and balance antagonistic performance criteria utilizing automatic operation. As opposed to static systems, automated shading and daylighting systems are increasingly being used in facade design with the intent to improve building performance. Taking this into consideration, the question that arises is whether such systems can significantly improve buildings energy performance and occupants' visual and thermal comfort. The present paper is a review of dynamic operation methods of shading/daylighting systems and their associated implications in building energy balance. Based on the subject distribution of the reviewed studies, the majority of the systems examined are versions of motorized blinds while the analysis of new emerging ideas on deployable and foldable facade systems is limited. User acceptance is quite crucial and is strongly dependent on the system's intuitive operation. According to the paper findings, energy savings with automatically controlled blinds depend on the type of control strategy and their connection to dimmable electric lighting systems. Even though control strategies enhance energy performance and occupants' comfort, their level of complexity highly affects their efficiency and therefore influences their performance. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available