4.8 Review

Utilization of coal ash: Is vermitechnology a sustainable avenue?

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 58, Issue -, Pages 1376-1386

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.345

Keywords

Coal ash; Soil pollution; Air pollution; Earthworm; Vermitechnology

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) [2009-0093848]
  2. Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Project title: Study on model development to control odor from pigpen) Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ01052101]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0093848] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although various alternative energy sources have been introduced from time to time, the dependence on coal has not yet been altered significantly. Large quantities of coal ash (CA) are produced due to the combustion of pulverized coal in power plants and other industrial units. Some CAs have relatively high content of essential nutrients and water retention capacity (due to high porosity) which should add their potential for agricultural and several engineering applications. However, as hazardous components (like heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and polychlorinated biphenyls) are preferentially entrapped in the finer proportion, a number of judicious solutions such as vermitechnology have been proposed to resolve those problems. Earthworms are demonstrated to be potent enough to treat various solid wastes. This review emphasized various aspects of hazardous contamination and beneficial role of vermitechnology for sustainable utilization of CA. Furthermore, we reviewed earthworm biology to signify its response toward soil contamination. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available