4.8 Review

A lifecycle-based sustainability indicator framework for waste-to-energy systems and a proposed metric of sustainability

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages 797-809

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.036

Keywords

Waste-to-energy; Indicator; Sustainability; Sustainable development; Lifecycle sustainability assessment; Sustainability metric; Index

Funding

  1. Singapore National Research Foundation
  2. Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) programme - Energy and Environmental Sustainability Solutions for Megacities [E2S2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies of waste-to-energy systems have applied a varying range of indicators to assess their sustain ability. The sets of indicators prescribed were often based on the respective context and are therefore of varying emphasis. Through a literature review, this research aims to develop a framework of sustain ability indicators that can serve as a reference for future research in waste-to-energy systems. Sustain ability indicators and their underlying factors from the three pillars of sustainability were consolidated and structured under a proposed framework. As factors interlinking between the three pillars such as carbon schemes are critical for sustainability, they were identified and described within the framework. The proposed framework is extended with a lifecycle dimension to facilitate lifecycle sustainability assessments. This article presents a novel metric of sustainability (MOS). The proposed indicator framework and the MOS are applied in a case study to demonstrate their functions in sustainability assessments. The case highlighted the advantages of the MOS and the importance of considering systems from a more holistic perspective, especially in practice where sustainability issues tend to fall within and across boundaries of the economic, environmental and social lifecycles. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available