4.8 Review

Cooling potential and applications prospects of passive radiative cooling in buildings: The current state-of-the-art

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 65, Issue -, Pages 1079-1097

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.07.058

Keywords

Passive radiative cooling; Building integration; Cooling potential; Energy conservation; Mathematical models; Review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The universe can be utilized as a sink for heat pumping by means of passive radiative cooling (PRC). This approach is an age-old cooling practice that has had a renaissance with increasing numbers of research papers over the past two decades. This paper reviews the trends of this technique, as well as advancements in recent years, with an attempt being made to analyze the cooling magnitude and developmental prospects for both diurnal and nocturnal periods. The models and calculations for computing the performances of passive radiative cooling systems are discussed along with the designs and fabrication factors that influence a system's performance. Optimizing strategies that maximize the net cooling power are also presented. The various system configurations that are available to date are summarized to demonstrate the building integration forms of PRC systems. The cooling potentials of different systems are assessed by simulations, and it is shown that the daytime cooling energy density is rather modest, even under the most favorable conditions. The barriers that likely exist to widespread application as well as the scopes for further improvements of PRC are also provided. It is noted that the commercialization of PRC systems is primarily limited by coating material constraints and technique reliability. The advent of a new type of material will be a critical solution to the prevalence of PRC. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available