4.8 Review

Institutional improvement measures for environmental assessment in the pursuit of eco-friendly ocean renewable energy development in South Korea

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 58, Issue -, Pages 526-536

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.299

Keywords

Renewable energy; Ocean energy; Environmental assessment; Eco-friendly development

Funding

  1. Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Establishment of impact assessment system and inundation assessment of cropland by sea_level rise) Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ010475012016]
  2. Korea Environment Institute [GP2013-08-02]
  3. Rural Development Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea [PJ010475012016] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper aims to identify institutional improvement measures to promote environmentally sustainable ocean renewable energy development by analyzing how the environmental assessment systems in South Korea are integrated into this development. The measures identified in the paper include (1) consideration of subjecting ocean renewable energy development to strategic environment assessment in order to assess the adequacy of relevant project plans and the validity of site selection at early stages, (2) new standards, such as the area of occupancy, integrated within the environmental impact assessment at the project implementation stage, (3) integration of the environmental impact assessment with the procedures for Consultation on Utilization of Sea Areas to reduce development cost, and delays and (4) reinforcement of post-development environmental monitoring processes to eliminate uncertainty or lack of knowledge about potential impacts on marine environment and habitat caused by development. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available