4.7 Article

Landslide mapping from aerial photographs using change detection-based Markov random field

Journal

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
Volume 187, Issue -, Pages 76-90

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.10.008

Keywords

Aerial photographs; Change detection; Landslide mapping (LM); Markov random field (MRF); Region-based level set evolution (RLSE)

Funding

  1. Hong Kong Polytechnic University [1-ZE24, 1-ZVE8, 1-ZEA5]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41201424]
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh010010] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Landslide mapping (LM) is essential for hazard prevention, mitigation, and vulnerability assessment. Despite the great efforts over the past few years, there is room for improvement in its accuracy and efficiency. Existing LM is primarily achieved using field surveys or visual interpretation of remote sensing images. However, such methods are highly labor-intensive and time-consuming, particularly over large areas. Thus, in this paper a change detection-based Markov random field (CDMRF) method is proposed for near-automatic LM from aerial orthophotos. The proposed CDMRF is applied to a landslide-prone site with an area of approximately 40 km2 on Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Compared with the existing region-based level set evolution (RLSE), it has three main advantages: 1) it employs a more robust threshold method to generate the training samples; 2) it can identify landslides more accurately as it takes advantages of both the spectral and spatial contextual information of landslides; and 3) it needs little parameter tuning. Quantitative evaluation shows that it outperforms RLSE in the whole study area by almost 5.5% in Correctness and by 4% in Quality. To our knowledge, it is the first time CDMRF is used to LM from bitemporal aerial photographs. It is highly generic and has great potential for operational LM applications in large areas and also can be adapted for other sources of imagery data. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available