4.7 Article

Learning selfhood scales for urban land cover mapping with very-high-resolution satellite images

Journal

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
Volume 178, Issue -, Pages 172-190

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.03.015

Keywords

Selfhood scales; Self-adaptive segmentation; Per-pixel classification; Object-based classification; Urban land cover mapping

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41471315]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urban land cover mapping with very-high-resolution (VHR) satellite images has raised many concerns in the fields of environmental and social investigations, but the classical per-pixel and object-based mapping results are not accurate enough to serve these applications, owing to the inappropriate analysis scales. Accordingly, this study aims to 1) propose a self-adaptive segmentation scale (i.e., selfhood scale), which refers to the optimum scale for analyzing a pixel and depends on the pixel's category and surrounding contrasts; and 2) apply selfhood scales to urban land cover mapping. For the first target, a learning mechanism is presented to estimate selfhood scales; for the second target, two methods (i.e., zipper merging and restricted forest) using the learned selfhood scales are proposed to respectively improve per-pixel and object-based classification results. The experimental results demonstrate that these methods achieve significant improvements in both per-pixel and object-based land cover mapping in urban areas as their overall accuracies are improved by 2.8% and 7.6% respectively. Moreover, the proposed methods are further used to generate land cover maps in Beijing and Zhuhai cities, which perform much better than the classical methods. Accordingly, it can be concluded that selfhood scales are effective to improve land cover mapping in urban areas. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available