4.7 Article

A novel flexible model for piracy and robbery assessment of merchant ship operations

Journal

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
Volume 155, Issue -, Pages 196-211

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.07.001

Keywords

Maritime security; Maritime piracy; Hijacking; Best management practice

Funding

  1. Leverhulme Research Fellowship [RF/7/RFG/2010-0019]
  2. EU Marie Curie Grant [314836]
  3. International Exchange grant from the Royal Society, UK [IE140302]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maritime piracy and robbery can not only cause logistics chain disruption leading to economic consequences but also result in loss of lives, and short- and long-term health problems of seafarers and passengers. There is a justified need for further investigation in this area of paramount importance. This study analyses maritime piracy and robbery related incidents in terms of the major influencing factors such as ship characteristics and geographical locations. An analytical model incorporating Bayesian reasoning is proposed to estimate the likelihood of a ship being hijacked in the Western Indian or Eastern African region. The proposed model takes into account the characteristics of the ship, environment conditions and the maritime security measures in place in an integrated manner. Available data collected from the Global Integrated Shipping Information System (GISIS) together with expert judgement is used to develop and demonstrate the proposed model. This model can be used by maritime stakeholders to make cost-effective anti-piracy decisions in their operations under uncertainties. Discussions are given on industrial response to maritime piracy in order to minimize the risk to ships exposed to attacks from pirates. Further recommendations on how maritime security and piracy may be best addressed in terms of maritime security measures are outlined. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available