4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Phoenix - A model-based Human Reliability Analysis methodology: Qualitative Analysis Procedure

Journal

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
Volume 145, Issue -, Pages 301-315

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.07.009

Keywords

Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA); Human Reliability Analysis (HRA); Human Failure Event (HFE); Performance Influencing Factor (PIF); Crew Failure Mode (CFM); Crew Response Tree (CRT)

Funding

  1. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) [NRC-04-09-143]
  2. Center for Risk and Reliability of the University of Maryland [NRC-04-09-143]
  3. USNRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phoenix method is an attempt to address various issues in the field of Human Reliability Analysis (HRA). Built on a cognitive human response model, Phoenix incorporates strong elements of current HRA good practices, leverages lessons learned from empirical studies, and takes advantage of the best features of existing and emerging HRA methods. Its original framework was introduced in previous publications. This paper reports on the completed methodology, summarizing the steps and techniques of its qualitative analysis phase. The methodology introduces the Crew Response Tree which provides a structure for capturing the context associated with Human Failure Events (HFEs), including errors of omission and commission. It also uses a team-centered version of the Information, Decision and Action cognitive model and macro-cognitive abstractions of crew behavior, as well as relevant findings from cognitive psychology literature and operating experience, to identify potential causes of failures and influencing factors during procedure-driven and knowledge-supported crew-plant interactions. The result is the set of identified HFEs and likely scenarios leading to each. The methodology itself is generic in the sense that it is compatible with various quantification methods, and can be adapted for use across different environments including nuclear, oil and gas, aerospace, aviation, and healthcare. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available