Journal
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
Volume 146, Issue -, Pages 33-38Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.10.011
Keywords
Conservatism; Risk assessments; Knowledge
Funding
- Research Council of Norway [228335/E30]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
It is common to use conservatism in risk assessments, replacing uncertain quantities with values that lead to a higher level of risk. It is argued that the approach represents a practical method for dealing with uncertainties and lack of knowledge in risk assessment. If the computed probabilities meet the pre-defined criteria with the conservative quantities, there is strong support for the real risk to meet these criteria. In this paper we look more closely into this practice, the main aims being to clarify what it actually means and what the implications are, as well as providing some recommendations. The paper concludes that conservatism should be avoided in risk assessments - best judgements should be the ruling thinking, to allow for meaningful comparisons of options. By incorporating sensitivity analyses and strength of knowledge judgements for the background knowledge on which the assigned probabilities are based, the robustness of the conclusions can be more adequately assessed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available