4.7 Article

Prognostic value of 18F-FET PET imaging in re-irradiation of high-grade glioma: Results of a phase I clinical trial

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 121, Issue 1, Pages 132-137

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.08.014

Keywords

Positron emission tomography; MRI; Re-irradiation; High-grade glioma; Prognostic markers; Metabolic imaging

Funding

  1. Capital Region of Denmark
  2. Lundbeck Foundation Centre for Interventional Research in Radiation Oncology (CIRRO)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and purpose: Positron emission tomography (PET) provides quantitative metabolic information and potential biomarkers of treatment outcome. We aimed to determine the prognostic value of early F-18-fluoroethyl-tyrosine (F-18-FET) PET scans acquired during re-irradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG). Material and methods: A phase I clinical trial of re-irradiation of HGG was carried out. MRI and F-18-FET PET were used for target delineation and follow-up. Images were acquired at baseline, during radiotherapy and 4 weeks post-treatment and compared by measuring the metabolically active biological tumor volume (BTV) and maximal activity (T-max/B). Correlations with outcomes were assessed by multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results: Thirty-one patients were included and all patients have died. The median overall survival was 7.0 mos. Both baseline BTV and baseline MRI volume (necrotic/cystic cavities subtracted) were prognostic for overall survival (OS) in multivariate analysis (HR = 1.3 p < 0.01 and HR = 1.3 p < 0.01, respectively). Early changes in BTV and Tmax/B were observed but they carried no independent prognostic information. Conclusions: Baseline biological tumor volume (BTV) defined by 18F-FET PET was prognostic for OS in multivariate analysis, as was MRI volume (necrotic/cystic cavities subtracted). Tumor volume may aid in identifying patients whose life expectancy is too short to warrant re-irradiation. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available