4.7 Article

Slice Encoding for Metal Artefact Correction in magnetic resonance imaging examinations for radiotherapy planning

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 120, Issue 2, Pages 356-362

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.004

Keywords

Image fusion for radiotherapy planning; MRI; Metallic implants in radiotherapy

Funding

  1. CR-UK Cancer Imaging Centre [C1060/A10334]
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden Clinical Research Facility
  3. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
  4. Cancer Research UK [16464] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0512-10162] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and purpose: Magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) images are degraded in the presence of metallic implants. We investigate whether SEMAC (Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction) MR is advantageous for radiotherapy (RT) planning. Methods: Conventional and SEMAC MR protocols were compared (1.5 T). A spine fixation device suspended in gelatine, two patients with spine fixation devices and six patients with bilateral hip replacements were scanned with both conventional and SEMAC protocols. In spine patients the visibility of the spinal canal and spinal cord was assessed; in prostate patients, the visibility of the prostate, pelvic structures and the pelvic girdle. Results: The signal loss volume surrounding the spine fixation device was reduced by approximately 20% when the SEMAC protocol was employed, and registration errors were reduced. For spine patients, the spinal canal was completely visible only using the SEMAC protocol. In hip replacement patients, metal artifacts were local; the signal loss extended to the internal surface of the acetabulum in eight implants with conventional protocols, but only in four using SEMAC. Conclusions: SEMAC MR contributes towards correct co-registration of MR and CT images for RT planning, and is particularly relevant when the TV or OARs are close to implants. (C) 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available