4.7 Article

Global ice volume during MIS 3 inferred from a sea-level analysis of sedimentary core records in the Yellow River Delta

Journal

QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS
Volume 152, Issue -, Pages 72-79

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.09.012

Keywords

Glacio isostatic adjustment; MIS 3; Sea level; Sediment; Yellow River Delta

Funding

  1. NSF-GRFP
  2. Harvard University
  3. NSF [EAR-1525922]
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Division Of Earth Sciences [1527351] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Directorate For Geosciences
  7. Division Of Earth Sciences [1525922] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Estimates of global ice volume during the glacial phase of the most recent ice age cycle are characterized by significant uncertainty, reflecting the relative paucity of geological constraints on sea level relevant to this time interval. For example, during the middle stages of Marine Isotope Stage 3, published estimates of peak global mean sea level (GMSL) relative to the present range from -25 m to -87 m. The large uncertainty in GMSL at MIS 3 has significant implications for estimates of the rate of ice growth in the period leading to the Last Glacial Maximum (similar to 26 ka). We refine estimates of global ice volume during MIS 3 by employing sediment cores in the Bohai and Yellow Sea that record a migration of the paleoshoreline at similar to 50-37 ka through a transition from marine to brackish conditions. In particular, we correct relative sea level at these sites for contamination due to glacial isostatic adjustment using a sea-level calculation that includes a gravitationally self-consistent treatment of sediment redistribution and compaction, and estimate a peak global mean sea level of -38 +/- 7 m during the interval 50-37 ka. With suitable sedimentary core records, the approach described herein can be extended to refine existing constraints on global ice volume across the entire glacial period. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available