4.2 Article

Chironomids as indicators of natural and human impacts in a 700-yr record from the northern Patagonian Andes

Journal

QUATERNARY RESEARCH
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages 120-132

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.yqres.2016.07.002

Keywords

Chironomidae; Bioindicators; Paleolimnology; Environmental impacts; Northern Patagonia

Funding

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica (Argentina) [PICT 2005-33838, PICT 2006-1051]
  2. International Atomic Agency [TCA-ARG/7/006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chironomid communities were studied in a sediment core collected from Lake Moreno Oeste, located in Nahuel Huapi National Park. A major change in midge assemblages occurred at similar to AD 1760, which was characterized by a decrease of cold taxa including Polypedilum sp.2 and Dicrotendipes, and an increase of warm taxa including Apsectrotanypus and Polypedilum sp.1. These taxa are likely related to climatic conditions concurrent with the end of a cold period at similar to AD 1500-1700 and the beginning of a drying climate at similar to AD 1740-1900 in northern Patagonia. Coarse tephra layers had low midge diversity; however they did not disrupt the climatic trend as the community recovered rapidly after the event. Since AD 1910, after the increase in suburban housing, fish introduction, and the construction of a road, there was an increase in the relative abundances of taxa typically associated with the littoral zone, such as Para-psectrocladius, Riethia, Apsectrotanypus, and some Tanytarsini morphotypes. The main change in the chironomid community appears to be associated with long-term climate change. At the beginning of the 20th century, other site-specific environmental factors (catchment change and fish introduction) altered the chironomid assemblages, making it more difficult to understand the relative importance of each driver of assemblage change. (C) 2016 University of Washington. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available