4.6 Article

A high-resolution regional reanalysis for Europe. Part 1: Three-dimensional reanalysis with the regional HIgh-Resolution Limited-Area Model (HIRLAM)

Journal

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY
Volume 142, Issue 698, Pages 2119-2131

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/qj.2807

Keywords

reanalysis; regional climate; data assimilation; numerical weather prediction; meteorological observations

Funding

  1. Rossby Centre at SMHI
  2. EU [242093]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A regional reanalysis covering the years 1989-2010 has been produced with the HIgh Resolution Limited-Area Model (HIRLAM) forecast model and data assimilation system. Surface and upper-air variables were analysed at 0000, 0600, 1200 and 1800 UTC on a three-dimensional grid-mesh with 22 km spacing covering Europe using conventional insitu observations. Information from the global reanalysis ERA-Interim has been used as a large-scale constraint in the data assimilation and as lateral boundaries in the forecast model integrations. Comparison to the global forcing reanalysis shows good agreement in the large-scale structures, as expected given the forcing from the boundaries and in the analysis. Comparison to the observed climatological distribution and a skill score evaluation showed that the HIRLAM reanalysis is better than ERA-Interim at describing extreme values of 2 m temperature and 24 h accumulated precipitation. However, no added value in the HIRLAM reanalysis could be quantified for the wind speed at 10 m over land. The first production run covered the years 1989-2010 and the statistics presented in this paper are based on that dataset. This reanalysis has also been used as input to a two-dimensional surface analysis using the MESoscale ANalysis (MESAN) system which is presented in Part 2. Since then both the two- and three dimensional reanalyses have been extended to cover the years 1979-2014.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available